JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 15, 2020

A- de 2020

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar

✓Claimant Luis Ramiro Torres Luquerna

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica
  • No es oportunidad para corregir o modificar demanda rechazada
Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Inexistencia de argumentación, razonamiento o motivación
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recursos de súplica interpuestos en contra del auto mixto que admitió unos cargos y rechazó otros argumentos formulados por dos demandantes en sus escritos de corrección.

La Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió CONFIRMAR el resolutivo cuarto del auto del día 22 de septiembre de 2020, por medio del cual se rechazaron todos los cargos no admitidos respecto del expediente D-13855 y la demanda contenida en el expediente D-13872.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el resolutivo
  2. cuarto. del auto del día 22 de septiembre de 2020 por medio del cual se rechazaron todos los cargos no admitidos respecto del expediente D-13855 y la demanda contenida en el expediente D-13872.
  3. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR a la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional a comunique el contenido de esta decisión a los recurrentes.
  4. TERCERO. ADVERTIR que contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.